Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Sanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Sanders

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR I could find nothing to back up the "New York Times best selling author" claim There seems to be no reviews or interviews outside of the blogs contained in the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Interviews in minor sources do not establish notability and neither do endless references to her own website. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm a little surprised neither surprised Amazon nor the local news reporter didn't vet her claim of being an NYT Best Seller, but I can't any evidence that she is a best selling author of any kind. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon publishes her books and sells them too so I suppose it's in their interests that people think she's a NYT bestseller. --Dom from Paris (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Obviously it is spam.-- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 04:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough independent reliable sources Alex-h (talk) 15:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self-promotional, little RS coverage. --Bangalamania (talk) 22:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.