Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo McCafferty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jo McCafferty

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Couldn't find any sources on this person or her music online. Personal website and blog are offline, leading me to believe that they have moved on from music without much fanfare. Novemberjazz 23:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Scotland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak kepp: Have added a nice little piece about her music and non-music careers, though it's from her employer's inhouse magazine. Also a uni profile at her current name, and a reliable-looking blog which confirms the change of name. PamD 08:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe any of those could be considered RS. ShelbyMarion (talk) 11:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable, no sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 00:15, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some coverage found here [1][2][3] and [4].-KH-1 (talk) 01:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to consider new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The sources added after the nomination do little more than show that this person exists, and that is not an indicator of notability. As Jo McCafferty (musician) she can only be found in a few minor local gig announcements and some gig reviews that don't add up to reliable and significant coverage. As Jo-Anne Tait (academic) she has a few brief interviews in specialist newsletters and announcements of appearances at conferences, but that does not satisfy the rules for academics either. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:47, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.