Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John D. Lord Pavilion
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Shedd Park (Lowell, Massachusetts). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John D. Lord Pavilion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn’t find sources suggesting any WP:GNG or WP:NBUILDING notability. — MarkH21talk 04:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21talk 04:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21talk 04:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Shedd Park, Lowell, Massachusetts, where it is located.Djflem (talk) 06:55, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Shedd Park (Lowell, Massachusetts). I haven't done a thorough search yet, but the notability of Shedd Park appears to be questionable as well. There's definitely no need for a separate article on the park's pavilion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect. All material and source (external link) are already at the "Shedd Park" article, created in 2013. Photos at this article, created in 2017, could be merged over, though, so "Merge" might be more descriptive. The two articles seem unaware of each other, do not link to each other. That happens and then a routine merge makes sense, with or without a merger notice being given. Nice catch, User:Djflem, for noting the duplication. If the deletion nominator had noticed the duplication, then IMHO an AFD would have been unnecessary: it could/should have just been merged (with or without making a formal merger proposal), and then the overhead of AFD could have been avoided. --Doncram (talk) 02:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect (nominator change): I agree with the above comments; I didn’t notice that Shedd Park (Lowell, Massachusetts) existed. — MarkH21talk 08:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.