Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Sitaras
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- John Sitaras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A single mention in a single magazine does not equal notability.
Was original PRODded; tag removed by an anon. IP. Oli Filth(talk|contribs) 13:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - One mention? Agree this does not confer notability. Wikipedia is not a small business directory. Jusdafax 15:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. No reliable sourcing found at Google or Google News. --MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Reliable sources located in The Financial Times, Robb Report, Men's Vogue, GQ, New York Post, and ESPN —Preceding unsigned comment added by SitarasFitness (talk • contribs) 00:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't meet the notability guidelines, only gets brief mentions in a few media articles. Lustralaustral (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.