Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tantillo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Tantillo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG notability. Even with a WP:BEFORE, coverage of him is either non-independent, or non-substantial (passing mentions).

For some additional background/context: This was originally soft-deleted in a previous AFD I opened in November 2020, and was requested for undeletion in December 2020 by a user stating they would "add verifiable sources" and "readdress any concerns". Since nothing in the article's body has been changed (and since the undeletion request only pointed out the existence of sources that are either non-independent or unsubstantial), I'm opening this for discussion again. Whisperjanes (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've done a bit of searching, but I agree with the nominator that there doesn't seem to be any significant secondary coverage of Tantillo that would satisfy WP:BASIC/the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:50, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seddon ^talk 23:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. he doesn't have any in-depth coverage. Peter303x (talk) 08:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.