Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Dedering
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Jonathan Dedering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe that Mr. Dedering qualifies for inclusion under WP:POLITICIAN. The article doesn't meet WP:GNG because all of the references cited either doesn't involve the subject directly or mentioned Mr. Dedering in passing along with other political candidates. Dolotta (talk) 23:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I can't see how this local political activist, one of thousands, comes anywhere close to meeting WP:POLOUTCOMES, much less WP:GNG. There are zero good national sources except for one tangentially about someone for whom he protested. Bearian (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete totally unremarkable activist and trounced political candidate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. In addition to all the reasons already specified above, it warrants note that the article was originally created by User:DederingforWI — so, not surprisingly because that's par for the course for this kind of thing, throw some WP:COI on the fire too. Bearcat (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.