Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Schatzkés

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Schatzkés

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Schatzkés was an expert on stamps. I do not think this is enough in his case to pass any prong on academic notability, and I definetly do not think any of our sourcing is enough for GNG, since the main source is a short blurb from an organization that was giving him an award. I searched for sources and could not find any additional substantial sources, mainly just random name drops. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and France. Shellwood (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All I can find in French are an orthopedic surgeon with his name, likely too niche to find in mainstream sources. The only thing I can find is this [1], he's listed in the association's database, he wrote a book about cancellations used on Mexican stamps, you can find his book if you look... Not really sensing much for notability for our purposes here. Oaktree b (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.