Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephmark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Josephmark

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly non-notable and typical Corporate Article with no significant links to established depth for this company. It is written like a Company profile and it appears to be driven by only marketing and promotional agendas. Light2021 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Clearly a self serving article. Teraplane (talk) 23:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom PR --Devokewater @ 20:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Advertisement. Deus et lex (talk) 12:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.