Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joymax
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Joymax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP (Google searches yielded only a few references to the gaming company, almost all of which are very brief). There are other references which aren't about the company at all. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 02:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 00:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per sources: Joystiq.com, BetaNews.net, DDaily.co.kr, etnews.com, ITDaily.kr, khan.co.kr, BoanNews.com, NACpress.com, Asiae.co.kr, news.mt.co.kr. Note: Google translates the company name from Korean to English as "Joyimaekseu". --Odie5533 (talk) 05:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 15:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per Odie5533. →Στc. 01:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.