Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Carlos Cusi Martinez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Carlos Cusi Martinez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Academic who appears to be a research scientist, with not many publications, no wider coverage and no major awards. Notability was tagged by a different editor in May, nothing has been done. Hence time for an AfD as he seems to be far short of WP:NPROF Ldm1954 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet any criterion of WP:NPROF. Way too early in this scientist's career to establish notability through NPROF. Qflib (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree this ECR does not meet WP:NPROF. -- asilvering (talk) 04:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Taxonomy is a low-citation field, and his citation counts look ok for that field, but not enough to convince me of notability through WP:PROF#C1, and there is nothing else. We have secondary sourcing for some of his research, but its independence is dubious, the research for which we have such sourcing is not the research led by him, and the sources merely name-drop him rather than giving much hint of his role in the research. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.