Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judo Filipinas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Judo Filipinas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group - no references beyond its webpage. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is inconceivable that a 21st century national sporting organisation (or governing body as it was described before I pointed out that it nothing of the sort) in a country with English as an official language could be notable without independent references being findable by Google searches. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not mean any of the specific criteria for notability of a sports league or organization under WP:SPORTCRIT or the general notability guidelines.CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:V. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think it also fails the relevant project's guidelines at Wikipedia:MMANOT#Organizations. Bearian (talk) 20:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - none of the links found on Google are useable; fails WP:GNG and WP:V. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 13:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources and nothing that shows this just created organization is notable. Papaursa (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It may become notable in the future, but for now, it's too soon, as there isn't much coverage for the organization just yet. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.