Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Stoffer
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 May 12. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and salt.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Julie Stoffer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Was contacted by this article's subject regarding WP:BLP concerns, which given some recent anonymous edits are valid ones concerning unsourced and pretty serious allegations. Given that this seems to be causing quite a bit of distress to the subject of the article and she has requested deletion, I suggest that it be deleted. The biographical notability is borderline at best, I don't really see that we can write a full biography here, and it seems that the information in the article could easily be briefly covered in the articles regarding the television shows. (Note: Below edit was made before this nomination was complete.) Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- YES!! Please delete! It is plagued with vandalism all the time! If someone makes it again, DELETE IT AGAIN or protect it fully!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoptheslander (talk • contribs)
- Delete and salt, per nom. This article seems destined to be a BLP violation, and I don't think it could be stopped by a simple delete. Salting would protect the subject from further harm as a result of this article. =David(talk)(contribs) 20:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per above. It's WP:N is questionable anyway. --Evb-wiki 21:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt per subject's request. DurovaCharge! 10:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Given the history, it's hard to see how a good encyclopaedic article could result from a Keep. Of course WP needs to protect itself from damaging libel cases, but I still think it's sad that a determined vandal can achieve such a result in what might otherwise be a borderline WP:N debate. Sheffield Steeltalkersstalkers 17:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. I think this would still be an AfD, but it probably would've gone through the process with a lot less vitriol associated with it. Although everyone here seems to be in agreement...would it be appropriate to close it early and delete, given the WP:BLP difficulties inherent? =David(talk)(contribs) 19:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I won't do it, given that it's my nomination. If someone comes along and wants to close it early, I have no objection. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. I think this would still be an AfD, but it probably would've gone through the process with a lot less vitriol associated with it. Although everyone here seems to be in agreement...would it be appropriate to close it early and delete, given the WP:BLP difficulties inherent? =David(talk)(contribs) 19:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.