Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumbulingam 3D
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep per WP:SKCRIT#1, nomination withdrawn and no votes for deletion. Cavarrone 18:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Jumbulingam 3D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film, no coverage, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 22:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete-per nom. I did put up the notability tag before-which looks like someone removed. Wgolf (talk) 22:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm finding some stuff, but it looks like the title is spelled "Jambulingam". Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and move to Jambulingam 3D. I found two reviews, which are enough to pass NFILM for the time being, and I get the impression that there might be more in Tamil, so I've asked for help with locating sources from WP:INDIA. I'd also recommend moving this to Jambulingam 3D since the bulk of the coverage uses an A instead of a U. There are some places that spell it with a U, but I figure we should go with how the title is predominantly spelled. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Before is alwaysy the best route:
- In Tamil:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- In Tamil:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- year/type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- year/type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- director 1:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- director 2:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- director 1:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- director 2:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- WP:INDAFD: Jumbulingam Jambulingam Ambuli Gokulnath Anjena KirtiHari Shankar Hareesh Narayan MPL Films
- STRONGEST Keep per due diligence finding sources enough under both spellings to show this released and reviewed film as having enough coverage to meet WP:NF...IE: [1][2][3] offered by the delightfuly diligent Tokyogirl79 and [4][5][6][7][8][9] as a few offered by myself. Notability is a lock. WP:BEFORE is so much fun when it finds SO MANY results. What say Wgolf? Bovineboy2008? Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep and I retract the nom due to the diligence of Michael and Tokyogirl. BOVINEBOY2008 11:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment-this is what happens when one misspells the title so you then think this is non notable as you can't find it. Wgolf (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed... mis-translations to English of non-English titles often has the same results... which is why WP:INDAFD tells us to try different spellings. In my own searches also include production and cast members. It is quite satisfying when my google-foo pays off. But in this instance I found results with both spellings using the WP:INDAFD search tools. Schmidt, Michael Q. 15:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Changing my vote to Keep thanks to some good detective work. Wgolf (talk) 02:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.