Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juneja
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Juneja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is riddled with original research and in fact unsourced research. There is no reason for a surname to be notable - especially when the substantially questionable claims are historic and not backed by secondary sources. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 19:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 02:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 02:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, or merge with Arora, their sub-caste. Bearian (talk) 03:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Stinks of OR. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.