Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kısmet Press

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 00:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kısmet Press

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a non-notable organization. All references are to the organization's website or are simply reviews of books the organization has published. —valereee (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now attempting rescue —valereee (talk) 11:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To clarify, Tim Barnwell is professionally associated with the press as is Ms Ani Landau-Ward, those two sources are not indicative of notability. -- GreenC 15:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GreenC, yes, quite right. I'm just sort of raking google, adding whatever I can find, hoping some of them will lead to other things. :) I suspect this doesn't meet our criteria, but I think if it goes delete I'll request it be userfied in my user space. I'd keep working on it, or possibly glean something for Academic publishing. —valereee (talk) 15:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm thinking WP:TOOSOON only active 4 years not enough time to establish notability. -- GreenC 03:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the nominator is unsure whether it meets the notability criteria.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, assuming that they didn't find any better sources. ——Serial^# 12:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Serial Number 54129, I haven't, and I contacted the organization to ask them whether they knew of any press. They don't. I'd still be happy to have this moved to my userspace, though, and I can set up a google alert. —valereee (talk) 12:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found any news article about the organization. Defintely WP:TOOSOON. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 13:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.