Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. K. Jiyas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

K. K. Jiyas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This cricketer has not played any First Class / List A / Twenty20 cricket. Hence he is not notable. Fenopy (talk) 13:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason stated above:

Fenopy (talk) 13:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fenopy (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Many of the above have represented national under-19 teams, but there is a longstanding consensus at WP:CRICKET that such players are not inherently notable. For the others there is not even a claim to notability. Thanks for your work in finding these, Fenopy. IgnorantArmies (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nine more articles were added after this vote. Fenopy (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete rationale extends to those articles and any further additions. IgnorantArmies (talk) 12:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all All fail WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all Zander Muir has had a few other mentions in the press (some related to rugby-playing at school-level) although even then he doesn't yet appear to be meeting WP:GNG. Otherwise these articles all appear to have been created on the basis that these people have played cricket at an under-19 level of representation. As noted above, this isn't sufficient to demonstrate notability when measured against WP:NCRICKET. Drchriswilliams (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all fail to meet notability guidelines for cricket players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.