Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KO-AM TV
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- KO-AM TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Washington. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, reasonable coverage in the Korean language ("코엠TV") [1][2] (The Korea Times (Los Angeles)), [3] (a fairly major South Korean Christian newspaper), [4] (Korea JoongAng Daily)
- Also feel inclined to preserve the article because it is a locally important publication for a minority community that could benefit from more advocacy and information shared about them. The article def could use a scrub up from a Korean speaker, but full disclosure I'm unlikely to do it because long to-do list. toobigtokale (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: No SIGCOV or notability found after searching. Sources might be there in Korean, but I couldn't find any International RS with WIGCOV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- What is "WIGCOV"? Haven't heard of it before; is there anything you'd like me to look up? Keep in mind SIGCOV can be proven in any language and I've identified several sources already in major South Korean papers that would be considered SIGCOV. toobigtokale (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.