Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalantaka (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kalantaka (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film is not out yet, the only reference used is on a part of the Kannada News website that self-identifies as "gossip" and doesn't seem very in-depth from what I could glean from machine translation. In short, at this time this film simply does not appear to be notable and this article was created by persons involved with the film Beeblebrox (talk) 00:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I note that they have now added two more sources. One is a facebook page, so no help with notability there. The other is a brief article from what appears to be a local news source, which verifies that the film was being made back in May and a trailer was expected out sometime last month, along with some very vague plot details. I don't feel like that helps insofar as notability either. At best this is WP:TOOSOON, the film certainly doesn't seem notable now, today. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 03:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 03:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We should have high standards for unreleased media like this, and this doesn't look to meet even the basic criteria. No prejudice on recreation when it's released and has more sources. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. No prejudice against recreation once it comes out.4meter4 (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.