Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kataluwa Walawwa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 11:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kataluwa Walawwa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing includes only very brief mentions of this residence. Searches did not turn up any in-depth coverage. Was deprodded with the rationale, "Most students, academics, researchers as well as interested parties of the History of native aristocracy and archaeology find this content much useful." Which isn't a valid reason to have an article. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a WP:COATRACK. Minkai^(rawr!)_{(see where I screwed up)} 18:50, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:COATRACK per normJuggyevil (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The building is notable as it is an archaeological protected monument.--L Manju (talk) 05:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.