Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Pearson
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Katie Pearson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This person, at this time, I don't think meets our site's notability standards for inclusion. Nominating for deletion. rootology (C)(T) 16:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unfortunately - There are some ghits and gnews hits for "Katie Pearson" but they appear to be about other individuals. LinguistAtLarge 20:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Possible redirect to Kate Pierson.SPNic (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to fail notability and WP:ENTERTAINER. Edison (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lacks a sufficient body of notable work. --Stormbay (talk) 03:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.