Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katsube Keigaku
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Katsube Keigaku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason: Delete per WP:BIO and WP:ACADEMIC. The page cites no sources whatsoever. Most references to Katsube Keigaku I've found searching the Internet have simply been obvious copy-pastes of this article. The only independent sources I've found discussing Katsube Keigaku explain his role as the teacher of Soen Nakagawa. While Soen Nakagawa is notable, teaching him isn't enough to merit one's own Wikipedia page. And I can't find any independent evidence of significant contributions by Katsube Keigaku to Zen Buddhism or Rinzai that would merit keeping under WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. Imareaver (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I also found nothing except article mirrors and trivial mentions in sources discussing Soen Nakagawa. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.