Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaushik Mitra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kaushik Mitra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has tone issues and notability issues. What is an ideator, anyway? Labeling someone as one, and as one of the "hottest creatives" is marketing gibberish. The two sentences could be taken out as marketing gibberish, but then a Google search would not provide anything worth adding to keep. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of verifiable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashi 1980 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Shashi 1980 (talk · contribs) has been blocked as a sock. ansh 666 08:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 08:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references in the article aren't independent and reliable. I can't find anything better (though searching isn't made easy by there being several academics and an actor with the same name!). Seems to be a run of the mill businessman. Neiltonks (talk) 12:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It looks relevant, but sources are problematic... Maybe it can be redone with proper format and layout. --Axiomus (talk) 12:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.