Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keane's controversies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sango123 23:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Random facts about Keane. Listcruft, and a possible copyvio -- the infor is taken from an FAQ site, according to the article. Ogdred 00:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fancruft trivia article. My Alt Account 00:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into the Controversies and criticism section of the Keane article. I checked the FAQ site, and there isn't a copyvio, though the article does seem to be based on it. --TBCTaLk?!? 01:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per TBC into controversies ot trivia. --Ageo020 02:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Ogred and 'My Alt Account' Artw 02:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and don't merge into the keane article. Richyard 07:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete mostly unverifiable trivia and original research (using the term research rather loosely). Guy 11:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge into Keane. --Alex (talk here) 16:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not even Eric West's Wiki fanclub would get away with such blatant cruft. Ac@osr 16:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non notable trivia Trnj2000 17:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.UberCryxic 19:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fancruft.--Húsönd 21:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fancruft. Ergative rlt 21:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment for TBC. I personally asked for permission to Chris Flynn for using the information from his website. He did want credits for. And a copyright tag is located at the bottom of the article.--Fluence 23:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If you find the way to merge it into Keane and it's not deleted, I won't fight keeping this article. And believe me. I cannot lose--Fluence 23:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment for TBC. I personally asked for permission to Chris Flynn for using the information from his website. He did want credits for. And a copyright tag is located at the bottom of the article.--Fluence 23:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into main article. --physicq210 06:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, but judiciously. Someone should vet this stuff for encyclopedic value. Fernando Rizo 18:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the ONLY thing that is relevant is the info about Chaplin's drink/drug problems, and that can be merged into the main article. The rest is irrelevant claptrap nonsense, and Fluence, we've already had this debate several times over at the main article. Also believe it's eligible for content forking. 'Fancruft'... I LOVE that term. :-D Flyingnelly 11:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.