Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keerthi Pandian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keerthi Pandian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress, only few passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG, WP:Nactor DMySon 12:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. The subject has featured in only few films and is a kind of WP:TOOSOON. Abishe (talk) 04:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify or Redirect: I agree that it is WP:TOOSOON in terms of WP:NACTOR—but, there is quite a lot of coverage on the subject. Therefore, I would suggesting "draftifying" as opposed to downright deletion, or, alternatively, "redirecting" to Thumbaa. Dflaw4 (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.