Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith L. Moore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keith L. Moore

I just don't see, based on this article, how he reaches the WP:PROF standard of notability, or any other notability standard. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 01:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:COATRACK for POV pushing. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep easily meets WP:PROF (chair, associate dean, prof. emeritus, associate pres., author [1]). ~The ad-text can be redacted. JJL (talk)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. See the citations at this Google Scholar search. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 04:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (Speedy & Strong) Meets and met many WP:PROF criteria: top citations around 1000, major textbook author, pres of professional org, awards, fellowships, etc. John Z (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.