Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Tang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam ^Sing! 13:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Tang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about composer which does not seem to meet WP:GNG. May meet WP:COMPOSER but I am unable to verify these claims. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This music composer is very notable internationally and has many reliable sources from government websites to prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pichu9x (talk • contribs) 03:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The person is this article meets the notability criteria of English Wikipedia. Samsobot (talk) 04:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to do more the say they meet policies, you need to prove it, With policy based arguments and reliable sources.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep According to this source listed in the article's reference list, the personality in question is a subject of several newspaper articles, notably The Straits Times (see ref 5,6 and 12 in the abovementioned source) Thus, it seems to have met the criterion for notable and significant coverage, just that this is not well reflected in the article. Cheers--Lionratz (talk) 04:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, only (talk) 03:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per sources noted by Lionratz; also as winner of awards including the Cultural Medallion, "Singapore's highest arts prize" [1][2][3][4] he passes WP:ANYBIO. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.