Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Dychtwald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:07, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Dychtwald

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable author. References are from paid editing. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's all really thin and as far as I'm concerned the subject doesn't really pass the GNG. I just blocked three editors in this history for UPE. Drmies (talk) 22:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.