Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Staples (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Ken Staples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable minor league figure. Created by Alexsautographs and then AfD'd by him in the second edit. Some sources mention him, but only in passing. Winning minor league championships as a manger isn't notable, anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If being a multi-time All-Star at the minor league level is notable, then I believe winning multiple championships is notable as well. Alex (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Where do you get this from? Being a multiple minor league All-Star does not make you notable. The argument has been put forth that someone being a multiple minor league All-Star will make you notable due to your likely ascension as a player. However, minor league managers aren't as likely to be promoted. First, you're comparing apples and oranges. Second, you're asserting the apples are golden delicious when they seem more like horse apples. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep... I know its a bit against the grain, but I prefer not to delete minor league managers that have numerous championships or awards. Just my opinion.Spanneraol (talk) 00:34, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting. Would you mind saying why? And if the fact that it was Class-C impacts it at all? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- My personal bias I'm afraid... one class-c championship wouldn't cut it but 3 seems worthwhile.Spanneraol (talk) 14:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting. Would you mind saying why? And if the fact that it was Class-C impacts it at all? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. While I have to admit Alex's editing habits are slightly...curious...the vast majority of this set of AfDs are clearly notable - as is this one. The fact the baseball he managed at was C-level is irrelevant, winning three league championships in professional baseball clearly establishes notability for a manager. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure I understand statements like this. I thought GNG and/or BASE/N were supposed to be used to define "notability" for purposes of baseball-related articles, but it seems like more and more people are applying their own subjective definition -- "played in Spain," "won 3 championships," "minor league all-star," etc. These AfDs are starting to seem like a big free-for-all. — NY-13021 (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is all subjective... besides playing in Spain passes BABE/N... though that refers to a different afd... The reason they are a big free for all is because we have an ungodly amount of them at once which I think is really ridiculous. Spanneraol (talk) 14:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with NY-13021 in that I don't understand how "winning minor league championships" suddenly trumps a dearth of sourcing. I've withdrawn nominations for articles where I did not find sources but others did. Unless sources are produced in this case, I'm sticking with my nomination. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is all subjective... besides playing in Spain passes BABE/N... though that refers to a different afd... The reason they are a big free for all is because we have an ungodly amount of them at once which I think is really ridiculous. Spanneraol (talk) 14:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think User:Muboshgu just has deletion fever, a multiple time championship is extreemly notable. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:34, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How is it notable? Saying it's notable does not make it so. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I added this link to external links: Ken Staples page at Baseball-reference.com. Then I rewrote the entire article, because most of the information in the article was a copyvio from this link. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It says in the article he also played professional. Surely there will be official records somewhere showing that. He gets coverage in the news for being a manager of a minor league team. [1] Dream Focus 01:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.