Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenza Drider
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No consensus on whether notability is met or not. Davewild (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kenza Drider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, only a thin coverage occurred in a 1/2 month span about her intention of running in the French Presidential Election, (not that she had a chance to even be eligible). No known other activity and no coverage in other contexts. Tachfin (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Could certainly do with improvement, but did receive significant coverage, as internet search will show multiple artices about her. PatGallacher (talk) 21:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the article needs fleshing out using the available sources, she is clearly a notable campaigner for the right to wear the veil. The Digital Journal also refers to other coverage in the Daily Mail and Saudi Gazette. Meets WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:02, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/Merge to French ban on face covering. This article is not very substantial, and she is mentioned multiple times in French ban on face covering. It is the logical place to discuss her views on veiling. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.