Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerfew
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete nancy (talk) 19:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kerfew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable musician. Article is written by User:Kerfew, so obvious conflict of interest is present. Most of the article is unsourced. This article has also been speedily deleted two times in the past, and has been recreated by the same user. CyberGhostface (talk) 04:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Totally understand, in fact it is was me doing it for him. I have since made my own log in and tried to write it from non-biased viewpoint. I think 'Kerfew' is not as notable as some though i feel his page is still worthy. I will source the article. --JD Patel (talk) 08:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't see how it fulfils any of the music criteria for notability. And if you're writing it on his behalf, there's a conflict of interests. --Karenjc 20:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kerfew? Gesundheit. Mandsford (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete This article has been recreated in the past. Fails WP:NOTE and WP:MUSIC Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Article was re-created in the past but was sub-standard.. only had 3 lines... .. This one has been made using S-ENDZ and dizzee Rascal's format( As codes and subheading where already present, all i had to do was change content! Please can someone check to see if this page is now Okay ?
--JD Patel (talk) 12:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.