Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Whitton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chelsea Headhunters. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 04:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Whitton

Contested prod.Non-notable hooligan, commited assault, went to prison. Nothing to warrant an article. As far as I can see sources only give passing mention to him and do not meet the "significant coverage" required by WP:N Paulbrock (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete As per nom. I've tried sooooo hard not to give a "!vote as per nom" but to be honest, I can't do anything but that here! The above makes it the point so well - covers all the aspects of WP:N/CA. StephenBuxton (talk) 14:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are in fact a few sources that mention him[1][2]. Still, for now looks like a BLP1E case at best. Not enough here to pass WP:BIO at the moment (although there is some chance that there are more sources out there; maybe some-one could do further digging). Nsk92 (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. Stifle (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^Keep There are sources, he may be noable, if we look for him in the right places.--86.29.249.238 (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:BLP1E and not notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 12:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
_Note Merge it with the Chelsea Headhunters firm artical? He was a member of it.--שראלהתקווה ' (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Not really sure which way to vote to be honest whether to keep or delete. However I have added the info about him - which is sourced as it is mentioned in a book which is viewable on Google Books - on the Chelsea Headhunters article. I don't believe that it is at all relevant to merge the article though.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E and per nom. Struway2 (talk) 09:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Change to Redirect to Chelsea Headhunters per User:Smile a While. I should have had a better look at the additions made by User:Tangerines before making my initial decision. Struway2 (talk) 07:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I fully agree with the above comments that Whitton lacks the notability for his own page. However, User:Tangerines has added sourced content to that page so I see no problem with making a redirect and it is a plausible search term. Smile a While (talk) 03:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the Chelsea Headhunters and add him to the list.--86.29.244.140 (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and having thought about it now, for the same reasons as outlined above.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sourced--

... ://irs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/21/1/1.pdf -* ... ://www.urban75.org/football/hooligan.html -* .. ://irs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/21/1/1.pdf--
;;://books.google.co.uk/books?id=73lGvk6EGWgC&pg=PA156&lpg=PA156&dq=%22Kevin+Whitton+(++English+Football+hooligan++&source=web&ots=RkePvVvgmd&sig=X0o1Fucvl1G7PvOiet8ndVX2Mq4&hl=en-- --86.29.254.136 (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2008 --86.29.254.136 (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.