Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Bin Mahfouz
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect. There is a duplicate article for this. Woohookitty 09:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like another autobiography, nothing spectacular. -- Eagleamn 09:20, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
- This nom was never added to a main VfD page. Fixing now. No vote for now. JYolkowski // talk 20:54, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Non-notable --Isotope23 00:37, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Certainly notable (251st richest person in the world in 1999 according to Forbes[1], accused of al-Qaida connections...). Please do a minimal amount of research before judging something "vanity" or "non-notable". This page is however a copyvio from [2], and we already have another article on him. Delete and redirect to already existing article at Khalid bin Mahfouz. Uppland 06:25, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Who called it Vanity? I'm aware he is the on the list Forbes billionaires, but at least to me, being 251st is not notable in and of itself. That sets the bar for notability much too low in my opinion. --Isotope23 12:54, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator implied that the article is what is usually termed "vanity" around here, you just called him non-notable. If you really think he is non-notable, I think you should nominate the real article, Khalid bin Mahfouz, for deletion. Uppland 13:45, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Who called it Vanity? I'm aware he is the on the list Forbes billionaires, but at least to me, being 251st is not notable in and of itself. That sets the bar for notability much too low in my opinion. --Isotope23 12:54, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.