Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khandan Kadir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 23:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Khandan Kadir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think that this meets WP:BIO. I see a lot of sources that are about the Guantanamo detainees in general, but very little about Kadir specifically. Also, WP:CRIME suggests that we should not usually have an article in situations like these. Also, commenters should be aware that I removed some unreferenced material per WP:BLP before nominating this article for deletion. You may wish to look at the article before I edited it to compare it with its current state. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 12:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Afghan detainees at Guantanamo Bay, as done with many others like this previously. The problem is the lack of sourcing about Kadir specifically, as noted by Mr. Stradivarius. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough media coverage for notability. RichardStevens89 (talk) 09:35, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Green Cardamom. There is insufficient substantial or not-in-passing media coverage for notability; name-drops do not count. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.