Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kikkerspuug

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Aoidh (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kikkerspuug

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found that this is a notable band. Fram (talk) 09:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Netherlands. Fram (talk) 09:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. After a WP:BEFORE search, I haven't found anything that seems to satisfy WP:N. Pizzahut69 (talk) 18:42, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This band is an important example of Dutch-language punk rock in the 80s. It is discussed on the Punk in the Netherlands page of Dutch wikipedia and has it's own band page on Dutch wikipedia that dates back 11 years. The present article is deeper and better cited than the Dutch page. Punk rock, particularly with non-English lyrics, is not a topic frequently discussed in newspapers or academic journals. Newspaper articles that may have been written about it (in the 80s, in the Netherlands) are no longer are accessible. This band is mentioned in long-running, widely distributed punk zines that are still accessible. Snowflakedivertor (talk) 02:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - While I understand the thoughts of the above editor, the sad fact is that there is not enough sourcing, either currently, or through searches to show that they pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.