Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Burfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Burfield

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR, only 2 appearances in major productions, and fails WP:GNG, NYT is a reliable source but is not significant coverage, only 1 sentence mentioning the actor. Mika1h (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mika1h (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP (I presume) fails GNG and NBIO. Found name is lists, nothing meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. I think the article is a SYNTH of IMDB info, doesn't meet BLP sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 22:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.