Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Wakerman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 08:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kim Wakerman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
not notable not a famous actor not even on imdb unlike Bel Powley — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeneral28 (talk • contribs)
- Delete WP:NN. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 08:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree not a notable actress not even on IMDB like Bel Powley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cibwins (talk • contribs) 10:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why isn't it deleted yet?Jeneral28 (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD runs five days. Darkspots (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No relevant sources turned up in a google search. Fails WP:BIO. Darkspots (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.