Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Nazish
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- Kiran Nazish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-promotion fails to provide WP:RS. Too many links to blogs and profile as journalist but fails WP:GNG. Fails WP:AUTHOR. No source to support her claim of winning a award. Greenbörg (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete look like an autobio by a SPA. she is a journalist but not notable enough to warrant an entry yet. found not much about her in RS except this interview [1]. --Saqib (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.