Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitchlu Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kitchlu Public School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No information that shows this school is interesting Mbch331 (talk) 06:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 06:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 06:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion has been given. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - experience shows that high schools, that invariably make a substantial impact on their communities, have the necessary sources to meet WP:GNG. Because of their notoriously poor presence on the Internet, Indian schools generally require local searches to identify the requisite sources. We don't delete likely notable subjects for lack of sources we tag and improve. TerriersFan (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion, public schools (and other government agencies) are notable for the reason that TerriersFan wrote and the fact that public schools are ran with tax payer money. --Ryan.germany (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting? That's a nomination?--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 02:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the only article this user has nominated for deletion with a "not interesting" rationaile. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.