Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolkata Christmas Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kolkata Christmas Festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement for non-notable local event. Lacks non trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 18:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The term "local" is relative especially as we're talking about Kolkata, a metropolitan area of over 14,000,000 which is a larger population than 46 of the American states. Similar to something like a Hollywood Christmas Parade or Dallas Christmas Festival in the smaller cities of Los Angeles and Dallas which there is no consideration of deletion, it's a major festival and it's of no surprise coverage is easily found from even English language sources in a predominately non-English speaking country from non-local sources like the Times of India and the Deccan Herald.[1][2][3] Many more sources with significant coverage are available. Might this be a case of WP:BIAS? --Oakshade (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to be notable. Times of India is a major newspaper in India and has an article focusing on this festival.2607:FEA8:1D60:3BF:FC9E:B095:FC2A:B49E (talk) 01:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.