Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Prakash (IPS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna Prakash (IPS)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a subject who does not seem notable to me for any of his achievements, pretty much refbombed to a mix of genuine news about him, pr and passing mentions. Police commissioners will always get some media coverage but what I can see doesn’t suggest this individual is anything other than ROTM. Mccapra (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only source I was attracted to was Outlook - but then it said Outlook Web Bureau which killed my interest in it. A civil servant who has got some news but not enough for notability. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No GNG, no reliable independent sources, looks paid to me, as the it has single contributor who created and majorly edited it. QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 14:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.