Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kryterium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kryterium

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all criteria for band notability. Let's look at the sources:

**Source assessment table:**
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
[1]	? 404	? 404	? 404	? Unknown
[2]	? Cannot determine affiliation due to use of pseudonyms.	Internet forum.	Two-line review in a forum post.	✘ No
[3]	? 404	? 404	? 404	? Unknown
[4]	WP:SPS	~ For some things, WP:SPS are okay like basic biographical verification, but not for establishing notability.	By virtue of SPS.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

All in all, this appears to be a case of yet another MySpace band. SITH (talk) 10:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A WP:BEFORE found not RS and IS. Fails WP:BAND. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Problem with having such a distinctive name is that it makes searching for RS easier. Nothing turns up on this band in my search. Per nom above, references in the article are either junk, and/or gone (did they ever exist). Certainly nothing to even start a WP:GNG case. Britishfinance (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only real coverage I found was the Boise Weekly article already cited. With metal bands there is often more offline coverage in metal magazines than there is online, but in this case it seems unlikely that there would be enough for notability. --Michig (talk) 08:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.