Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lardpony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lardpony

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely not notable with all my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) finding nothing good and with no improvement or move target, there's nothing to suggest keeping. I could've also easily PRODed but I wanted comments for weight. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete just another backyard band with self-released CDs (the good old days, when it was impossible to press one's own vinyl records are gone, sigh...) fails all guidelines of WP:NBAND, sources are MySpace and their own website... Kraxler (talk) 15:16, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.