Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Houérou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Le Houérou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one of these people have articles, and this person is listed as an uncited middle name. Once more people with this name have articles, I'd say re-create, but for now it should be deleted Ego White Tray (talk) 04:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to providing useful disambiguation the page also explains the term's origins and meaning. Deletion would make wikipedia less useful. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have removed half the persons for whom WP:BIO notability appeared unlikely. – Fayenatic London 19:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctant keep. It's unfortunate that there are no actual articles, but there are indeed people who deserve them. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, why would this family name be non-notable? A name can be notable, even if it had no particularily famous bearers. --Soman (talk) 04:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.