Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legiotex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legiotex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another European Commission 7th Framework project with no real notabilty. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everybody I do not understand that it serves this section. What should I write here so that the article is not clear?Rubendesign (talk) 12:05, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, but author should be answered. --DThomsen8 (talk) 22:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable? What are the parameters to know whether or not it notable? I think it's very subjective. Articles are different for people according to their tastes or interests. For example for a doctor my article will be important while for others no. Is notable for example Frazer Diner? Not for me but for you can be wonderful. Everything is subjective.(talk)Rubendesign (talk) 08:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't find evidence of notability. Notability guidelines are not subjective. We need significant coverage in multiple (i.e. two) reliable sources. Notability criteria is discussed here and a reliable source is defined here. ~KvnG 00:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 22:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.