Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Pirhaji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep , nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete arguments. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leila Pirhaji

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are several quality sources here, however, they are about Dr Pirhaji's company, and only mention the subject in the context of a passing quote from her as CEO. Other sources - such as papers Pirhaji has written - are not WP:INDEPENDENT. The only article about Prijahi is this in a business journal [1] which, while fine, isn't enough on its own to establish GNG. Pirhaji also doesn't seem to meet WP:NACADEMIC (h-index of 6 [2]).

Some of the sources also don't support the statements which they're used to support. In one example, this link to the company's website [3] is a pass-through link [4], neither of which mention Pirhaji at all. But they're used to support the statement "she received funding from ... MIT100K."

Ultimately, this reads like an article on the company ReviveMed with some mild puffery and a sentence on her education splashed in from her Bloomberg company profile. I'm sure she'll eventually warrant an article but this feels forced and too soon. Wolfson5 (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've changed it to being a page more about the company with a small section on Leila. Admit it is maybe too soon. Let me know what you think Wolfson5. Apologies for puffery, trying to stop doing it. Jesswade88 (talk) 09:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as an article on ReviveMed; and keep the original name as a redirect. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the article moved to a new namespace I think it makes sense. Thanks! Wolfson5 (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.