Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Pareja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Pareja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate any significant external coverage from reliable sources. Home Lander (talk) 00:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A successful real estate broker, but the potential sources seem to amount to a bunch of resumes and commercial promotion. I don't see any evidence of the substantial coverage in independent reliable sources that we require to establish notability.--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with nom and Arxiloxos. Reads like a puff piece and has no indication of notability. Fails WP:NBIO. Curious that many of the substantive edits to this article appear to have been done by his wife. Jip Orlando (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable real estate agent.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Non–notable subject and article appears to be promotional. Lepricavark (talk) 20:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.