Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonardo Puglisi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 13:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo Puglisi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough WP:SIGCOV to justify having an article on a minor, particularly given this has already been subject to significant vandalism ITBF (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism. ITBF (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, subject has received coverage from major Australian news outlets on several different occasions, take this in News.com.au, this in The Age and this by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Clear WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E pass. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: there's been repeated third party coverage of his journalism, particularly related to the high profile interviews he organised. The vandalism seems to have coincided with the subject calling attention to their article (https://twitter.com/Leo_Puglisi6/status/1553987410609913856 and https://twitter.com/Leo_Puglisi6/status/1554048161500512257), so it's not clear whether that'll be an ongoing problem. Given how young the subject is, care is obviously needed to ensure the article only covers information he has chosen to make public. James (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per Devonian Wombat and James, with an added helping of WP:NORESVAND. De Guerre (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and semi-protect: Clearly notable; the vandalism spike seems to have finished, but given his profile and detractors I can foresee it recurring. Josh Parris 07:28, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.