Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Baumann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep‎‎. Nominator blocked indefinitely for socking. No prejudice against a new nomination by any editor in good standing. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 13:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Baumann

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable dermatologist, fails WP:GNG. Fhektii (talk) 12:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Medicine, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See [1]. No comments yet so procedural keep is in order. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but discussion should continue. The sock is not connected to any master as far as I can see. Coming to this subject, I think she is definitely notable and is mainly known for Baumann Skin Types. Undisclosed paid editing is certainly going on as I cannot find any negative information in her biography. This article in The New York Times explains why F.D.A. warned Dr. Leslie Baumann about promoting Dysport. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — 84.146.2.66 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.