Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Kulesh (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Kulesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This nomination is in response to a technical request for help from Warrenking (talk · contribs) on my talk page; I have no opinion one way or the other on the merits of deletion. Note that the previous AfD was speedily closed (by me) due to being a malformed nomination.

The gist of the rationale for deletion is that this person fails WP:ARTIST and WP:BIO. A more complete explanation is available on the article talk page. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 10:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:PROMOTION. DonCalo (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable...Modernist (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does seem to have created a body of work, but it's not clear that it's received sufficient attention to be deemed notable. Gets some hits in the blogosphere, but seem to be mostly brief mentions and WP:ROUTINE listings. This is about as solid as it gets. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.