Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leszek Rychlewski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leszek Rychlewski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lenghty article but the subject does not seem to meet GNG/NBIO/NPROF. Sources are mainly in passing or by the subject. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Subject has over 10,000 citations on Google Scholar, which looked like a keep. The highest cited works have an extremely large number of coauthors. There are several with 100s of citations, however. The article is pretty promotional, and focuses too much on his BioInfoBank company. The sourcing is not great. I'm split between a keep and a WP:TNT delete. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are absolutely 0 results for him on JSTOR, he doesn't meet the subject-specific notability guidelines for Academics. Angus1986 (talk) 11:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.